Friday, 15 March 2019

Laptop is faster than Desktop

I had been most confident that my desktop PC is much faster than my laptop or notebook.
Although I read a lot of benchmarks, and compared benchmarks between processors, I never compared them between desktop against laptops, because I was sure that desktops will win. Wrong.

My most powerful desktop is an AMD3+ socket FX8320, the second fastest in the family of 8 core processors built by AMD. The highest is FX8350. The absolute fastest is the power hungry FX9XXX but it is very expensive and consume too much power and is too hot.

Compare it to my second hand laptop, the Zbook 15, with i7-4800. The fastest is i7-4930 which this workstation is capable of. My Zbook is equipped with 32Gb of DDR3 1600 MHz RAM. My desktop was also equipped with 32Gb DDR3 RAM, at 1860 Mhz.

Look at the userbenchmark readings:
AMD FX-8320-RM 363
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.2% Above average
SC Int 77.4
SC Float 69
SC Mixed 73.9
59% 73.4 Pts
QC Int 256
QC Float 223
QC Mixed 234
54% 237 Pts
MC Int 431
MC Float 382
MC Mixed 429
62% 414 Pts

Intel Core i7-4800MQ-RM 2,075
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.3% Good
SC Int 105
SC Float 107
SC Mixed 105
84% 106 Pts
QC Int 316
QC Float 287
QC Mixed 317
70% 306 Pts
MC Int 450
MC Float 464
MC Mixed 454
68% 456 Pts

Therefore the laptop is faster.

If I were to upgrade them to the highest: fx9590 vs i7-4910mx
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed

59.9 %

66.9 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+12%










https://dev1.notebook-check.com/index.php?id=2436:
   Model
TDP (Watt)MHzCores / ThreadsPerf. Rating3DMark06 CPUCinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Core i7-4910MQ4729004/8
95.8
7078
1.72n3
Intel Core i7-4800MQ4727004/8
94.5
7265n11
1.63n15
AMD FX-835012540008/8
75.3
6648
1.1n2























Worse, desktop PCs CPUs consume more power, and higher frequency, and yet have much lower benchmark readings.

No comments:

Post a Comment