After putting my profile and cache in RAM using ramdisk, I try to benchmark it.
The technique to do the above is found at:
I have added a method to increase ram to 1Gbyte by setting the amount of RAM to 1,000,000.
https://lifehacker.com/5687850/speed-up-firefox-by-moving-your-cache-to-ram-no-ram-disk-required
To compare my result with others:
https://venturebeat.com/2018/07/09/browser-benchmark-battle-july-2018-chrome-vs-firefox-vs-edge/2/
Using SunSpider 1.0.2, I managed to get 290.6 mS.
https://webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html
The result from the browser comparison above was 332.5 mS.
Edge was fastest at 119.9 mS.
With my PC, a Thinkpad W530 with 16MB of RAM, it is 141.6ms +/- 3.4%.
SunSpider is a test for Javascript. It is not supposed to test cache RAM but somehow the extra cache RAM has improved its SunSpider benchmark result.
For graphics, better use HTML 5 benchmark:
GUIMark 2, bitmap, http://www.craftymind.com/factory/guimark2/HTML5GamingTest.html
Firefox Quantum 61.0.1 64-bit,
Test Average: 46.52 fps
Edge,
Test Average: 49.72 fps
Chrome:
GUIMark - Bitmap Game Test
Current: 58.82 fps
Test Average: 58.82 fps
Firefox:
GUIMark - Vector Chart Test
Current: 47.61 fps
Test Average: 46.3 fps
Edge:
GUIMark - Vector Chart Test
Current: 24.85 fps
Test Average: 49.75 fps
https://html5test.com/
You are using Firefox 61.0 on Windows 10
Your browser scores 497 out of 555 points
Your browser scores 492 out of 555 points
You are using Edge 17 on Windows 10
So, if you like to watch Youtube, use Firefox, if Online shopping, Edge.
Chrome is said to be faster with HTML 5:
YOUR BROWSER SCORES 528 OUT OF 555 POINTS
You are using Chrome Dev 67.0.3396.99 on Windows 10
But Chrome cannot download Youtube videos. If I like a video, I would rather download first, then watch.
Too many restrictions with Chrome and Edge, so I do not use them.
No comments:
Post a Comment